Resist Digital ID Panel Presentation Link and Resources
A joint AMPS and AusExitsWHO initiative
Follow up to the Resist Digital ID Panel Presentation which was a joint AMPS and AusExitsWHO initiative on Friday Evening.
If you were unable to make it on the night, it was recorded and the replay can be found here: https://substack.com/@nicolacharles1/note/p-181030648?r=s4sz9&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web
It will eventually make it to the Aus Exits Rumble channel and website and we’ll let you know when that happens. We have had some changes in our core team and are a little short on technical knowhow and design skills. If you would like to volunteer to help, we’d love to hear from you.
You can connect to the panellist’s:
Dr Duncan Syme: https://amps.redunion.com.au/executive
Ben Britton: https://x.com/realbenbritton
Nicola Charles:
Stephen McGrath:
Potential VPN: https://mullvad.net/en
You can also check them out: https://x.com/mullvadnet
Please find attached an Age Verification Privacy Guide prepared by Luke@askluke.tech (formerly freedomtechsolutions.net)
Notice of Criminal Liability to follow-up:
#56 is a short video summary of #55, refer also to #50 on Digital Slavery & the Global Digital Court, #48 on FakeI = AI & TFIA, and #38 Patent WO2020060606 Crypto currency system using body activity data.
Suggested Action:
Skim or read and copy #55 Notice of Criminal Intent.
Get an appointment and visit your local MP and hand it to them. If you can’t get an appointment, ask for their local email and email it to them.
When you present it to your MP advise them you know it was emailed to their parliamentary email address on 10/10/2025 or soon after (from a kasmac99 address). It isn’t legal to delete official emails, so they cannot deny knowledge of it and therefore need to read it.
Ask them what they are going to do about avoiding their criminal liability that will flow from inaction. This gives them a chance of retrieving control of the country from the unelected bureaucrats who have dropped them into this criminality. Go prepared with a local (for you) example of the criminality if you can, like post #62 Stopping official coercion & terrorism at Brisbane International Airport.
Keep a record of your interactions and contact Steve to keep him updated:
https://stephenmcgrathphd.substack.com/p/notice-of-criminal-liability/comments
Follow up regularly (weekly/fortnightly).
You can read more about the various Acts discussed:
Online Safety Act (amended) 2024 https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2024A00127/asmade/text
Digital ID Act 2024 https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2024A00025/latest/text
Section 74 Digital ID is voluntary
Follow AusExits on Socials:
Telegram: https://telegram.me/share/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Faustraliaexitsthewho.com%2F&text=Home
Linked In: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/?linkOrigin=LI_BADGE&shareActive=true&shareUrl=https%3A%2F%2Faustraliaexitsthewho.com%2F
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ausexit
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ausexitswho/
X: https://x.com/AusExitsWHO
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2421604
You might also like to keep in touch with us by subscribing to recieve information direct from Aus Exits WHO:
https://australiaexitsthewho.com/
If you value my work, please consider buying me a coffee: buymeacoffee.com/DebraYuille
Happy to help with the website if you need a pair of hands Debra.
Regarding section 74, have you read the full text? I assume you have.
For the benefit of those who did not, here are some pertinent points that I think are worth highlighting:
"(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a service of a participating relying party if:
(a) the service provides access to another service; and
(b) the individual can access the other service by means other than the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System; and
(c) the other means is reasonably accessible; and
(d) using the other means does not result in the other service being provided on substantially less favourable terms."
Please keep sections c and d in mind and take a look at the EXAMPLE the legislation document itself provides:
"To open a bank account, ABC Bank requires new customers to verify their identity. ABC Bank allows customers to do this in person at each branch of ABC Bank or alternatively by using the bank’s online application service, which requires the use of a digital ID. Jacob wants to open a bank account with ABC Bank but he does not wish to use his digital ID to do so. Because Jacob can verify his identity by going to his nearest branch instead, ABC Bank does not contravene subsection (1)."
Now if you think this is a bit sus/odd, this was just a 'warm up'. Here comes the Bazooka in the form of subsection 3:
"(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) the participating relying party is providing a service, or access to a service, to an individual who is acting on behalf of another entity in a professional or business capacity; or
(b) the participating relying party holds an exemption under subsection (4)."
CAN YOU SEE?
I will not quote subsection 4 here but will say it is a legal minefield and leaves the door open to private enterprise to MANDATE the Federal Government's Digital ID scheme MyID through many means and loopholes.
Sorry but if anyone thinks in late 2025 that the GOVERNMENT will enact legislation to protect the citizens from ITS OWN arbitrary actions and casual totalitarianism then I think you are well overdue for a "booster"!
Ms. Yuille, below is Republia’s Redeclaration that as men of the Republic, we reaffirm that the Coequal Rights of Conscience may not be infringed, that Self Governance is the Supreme Law of these Lands—and that we do so for the reunification of our Country, as one People with a shared American Identity, standing against tyranny of all forms.
Please join us!
https://republia.substack.com/p/for-the-preservation-of-freedom-and